We so greatly appreciate not only your financial support – but the time and effort you take to reach out to us and on our behalf to law makers and potentially helpful organizations.
Taking just a few minutes to share with those you know, and in turn their subsequent sharing is giving a voice to those who cannot speak for themselves.
Jeff and Joe will be in Austin tomorrow at the state capital with Texas Values for Faith and Family Day. Pray for ears willing to listen and hearts ready to hear and follow through with actions that are necessary to protect our children.
The scientific evidence shows that people are not born trapped in a body of the wrong sex. Identical twin studies prove there is no biological or innate basis for the most fundamental claim made by transgender child abuse advocates.
Almost all gender-confused children grow out of it by adulthood. Affirming a child’s gender confusion increases the severity and duration of the gender confusion.
Treatments for childhood gender confusion are not proven safe. They are off-label, experimental protocols on innocent children.
This afternoon’s court date has been cancelled. Ms. Georgulas’ legal team cancelled just this morning in apparent realization that their motion to close further court documents and proceedings would not be honored as presented.
There will still be further negotiations between legal teams behind the scenes as this battle continues, but this is EXCELLENT news!
The public has been heard! Thanks to your vocal support via social media, the petition, and letters to local and state legislators the Judge was made aware that the public has a vested interest in this case.
We are working together to Save James – Save Thousands of Children!
Please continue to share – more updates to follow.
Once boys are chemically castrated by puberty blockers, they never again identify normally with their biological sex. The only follow-up study shows that all of the children put on puberty blocker chemical castration remained gender dysphoric and pursued sex change surgery. All of them.
Behavioral and emotional problems and depressive symptoms decreased, while general functioning improved significantly during puberty suppression. Feelings of anxiety and anger did not change between T0 and T1. While changes over time were equal for both sexes, compared with natal males, natal females were older when they started puberty suppression and showed more problem behavior at both T0 and T1. Gender dysphoria and body satisfaction did not change between T0 and T1.
No adolescent withdrew from puberty suppression, and all started cross-sex hormone treatment, the first step of actual gender reassignment.
Vries, Annelou L.C. de, Thomas D. Steensma, Theo A.H. Doreleijers, and Peggy T. Cohen‐Kettenis. “Puberty Suppression in Adolescents With Gender Identity Disorder: A Prospective Follow‐Up Study.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine, no. 8 (August 2011): 2276–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01943.x.
The transgender therapy advocates claim this is a vindication of their diagnostic protocol. They claim to have a 100% success rate in predicting who is seriously gender dysphoric.
Balderdash. The study shows that the transgender therapy diagnostic protocol is a total failure. This Journal of Medicine study shows:
Puberty blocker chemical castration is an ineffective treatment for gender dysphoria. None of the children who who were chemically castrated got better. In fact, they got worse and moved on to surgical transition.
Creating a hormonal and social environment that affirms gender dysphoric feelings causes children to remain gender dysphoric. Puberty blocker chemical castration is not a treatment. It’s operant conditioning a child to remain in a state of gender delusion.
Anecdotal stories abound of puberty blockers being the first step in an inevitable march toward the transsexual life. In the only study to date following gender dysphoric children who were socially affirmed and put on puberty blockers, 100 percent of the children continued to identify as transgender, and pursued further sex-change interventions.
One. Hundred. Percent.This stands in stark contrast to gender dsyphoric children who are allowed to go through puberty naturally. The American Psychiatric Association reports that up to 97.8 percent of boys and 88 percent of girls experience an end to their sex confusion and do not end up identifying as transgender adults.
Putting kids on puberty blockers does not let them choose anything. It makes the choice for them.
“Doctors currently have no way of predicting which gender dysphoric children will persist in their gender dysphoria, and yet they are pushing the minimum age for irreversible hormone therapy and surgery as low as possible.
According to the wisdom of the day, kids experiencing gender dysphoria need to be treated affirmingly as early—and as radically—as possible. For the time being, surgery and hormone therapy have to wait until age sixteen. But before that, adolescents can be prescribed puberty blockers, and even younger children are encouraged to transition “socially,” by adopting the name, dress, and mannerisms of their preferred gender.
All of this is in spite of the fact that gender dysphoria in children sees very low rates of persistence—ranging from 2.2% to 30% in males and from 12% to 50% in females, according to the DSM-5.”
Standards Are Getting Looser, Not More Stringent
In fact, a team of international doctors affiliated with The Endocrine Society, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the World Professional Association of Transgender Health—all of which are held in esteem in this field of medicine—is rewriting treatment guidelines so that a medically induced gender change may be recommended for children even younger than sixteen.
Social Transition Is Not Harmless Either
As Eric Vilain, a geneticist and leader of the Center for Genetic Medicine Research at Children’s National Health System, points out, social transitioning is liable to influence children’s thinking. “If the children are pushed in this belief it will be much harder for them to get out of this belief because everyone will have agreed on it very, very early on,” Dr. Vilain says. It’s one thing to grow up confused about one’s gender; it’s another thing to grow up being told that one belongs to a special group of “trans kids.”
The Amicus Attorney has permitted James’ father to cut James’ hair. James’ father believes that Anne Georgulas (on Facebook,on Twitter) wants to feminize James before trial, by letting his hair grow long into a girl’s hairstyle.
The Custody Evaluator, Benjamin Albritton, is taking a long time to complete his evaluation. It’s been three months.
The office assistant says that Dr. Albritton and Dr. Eagle are continuing to “sort through the data and information” they have been given.
This contradicts a previous letter sent by Dr. Albritton that Dr. Eagle had resigned from the case.
Dr Albritton asked James’ father to schedule another in-office visit with James and Jude, this will be the third such visit.
Dr. Albritton asked James’ father to schedule a private visit without the boys. But this is for later and not at this time.
That means the custody evaluation is going to take a lot longer.
We have a hearing scheduled for 28 February, 2019 at 1:30 pm, on Ms. Georgulas’ Motion to Seal.
Ms. Georgulas and the Judges want to hide what they are doing to James. The People of Texas have a right to know what is happening in their Family Courts on this pressing transgender legal and social issue.
The hearing will be in the Associate Judge’s courtroom at Judge Scott Beauchamp, George L. Allen, Sr. Courts Building, 600 Commerce Street, 4th Floor New Tower, Dallas, TX 75202.
It is not a special set. The hearing should be brief, lasting around 20 minutes.
Ms. Georgulas will be represented by her new super-expensive, high-powered law firmKoons-Fuller.
A study by Lisa Littman, Assistant Professor of Behavioral and Social Sciences at Brown’s School of Public Health, finds that transgenderism can be caused by peer pressure.
Rapid-onset gender dysphoria describes a phenomenon where the development of gender dysphoria is observed to begin suddenly during or after puberty in an adolescent or young adult who would not have met criteria for gender dysphoria in childhood.
[…] peer group and online influences may contribute to its development. It is unknown whether the gender dysphoria of rapid-onset gender dysphoria is temporary or likely to be long-term. The elevated number of friends per friendship group who became transgender-identified, the pattern of cluster outbreaks of transgender-identification in these friendship groups, the substantial percentage of friendship groups where the majority of the members became transgender-identified, and the peer group dynamics observed all serve to support the plausibility of social and peer contagion for ROGD.
Peer-pressure among adolescents and young adults can induce the “contagion for Rapid-onset Gender Dysphoria.”
Imagine how much influence James’ mother has over him. Her influence over this six-year-old boy is much greater than any peer group.
James’ mother, Anne Georgulas (on Facebook,on Twitter), has “socially transitioned” him. All of his authority figures – teachers, school police officers, school librarian – say he is in fact a girl.
This powerful, authoritative socialization forces James to accept the delusion that he is a girl. If it can happen to young adults, how much more vulnerable are young boys and girls to social influence?
Remember to support us in our fight to Save James.
Every. Single. Day. You have to see your son sexually abused, and you have to maintain your calm because the courts are not going to be fair to you. And the only way you can survive this and get your son through this alive is to calmly allow your son to be tortured right before your eyes and outlast the opposition. That’s what it’s like.
For anyone who is not quite sure of the history of pediatric transgender care.
This video thoroughly details the history and development of transgender medicine. It compares medical science vs. the “facts/claims/statistics” that are being argued to support pediatric affirmation of transgenderism.
We highly encourage anyone who has questions to watch this.
About 70% of gender dysphoric children will stop being trans and instead identify with their biological sex by age 21.
Childhood social transition of boys causes them to persist in their gender dysphoria rather than curing it.
The 70% rate of desistence has been established in many studies. Most of the children who present gender dysphoria are actually not transgender. Singal writes:
Again: Every study that has been conducted on this has found the same thing. At the moment there is strong evidence that even many children with rather severe gender dysphoria will, in the long run, shed it and come to feel comfortable with the bodies they were born with. The critiques of the desistance literature presented by Tannehill, Serano, Olson and Durwood, and others don’t come close to debunking what is a small but rather solid, strikingly consistent body of research.
The Steensma study cited above found:
Childhood social transitions were important predictors of persistence, especially among natal boys. Social transitions were associated with more intense GD in childhood, but have never been independently studied regarding the possible impact of the social transition itself on cognitive representation of gender identity or persistence. As we previously indicated, the percentage of transitioned children is increasing and seems to exceed the percentages known from prior literature for the persistence of GD, which could result in a larger proportion of children who have to change back to their original gender role, because of desisting GD, accompanied with a possible struggle or it may, with the hypothesized link between social transitioning and the cognitive representation of the self, influence the future rates of persistence.
I think we must use common sense. Cross-dressing a young boy and telling him he really is a girl is a lot like telling him that Santa Claus exists. For a time, he will believe the delusion, but eventually the truth comes out.
Social transition psychologically conditions a boy to maintain his delusions and discomfort with his biological sex.
Do you think James’ mother abused James by socially transitioning him at such a young age? Did she predispose James to serious psychological problems in the future?
Let’s give James a chance at a normal life. Help us win this case to prevent other kids from enduring transgender child abuse.
The Reddit naysayers are again doing their best to slander and confuse the situation by trying to point to years old divorce proceedings as “proof” of a scam. We have made a simple response and do not intend to fuel the thread further.
We have done our very best to prove validity of this situation by showing actual interactions of our family with these kids, a letter from State Representative Matt Rinaldi and the scanned copies of court documents we received from the actual court house with copy of the receipt showing that we paid for them.
This is an attempt to divert attention away from the real issue which is James and Jude…. and prevent the support that is needed to fight for them.
No matter your religious views or orientation- a child’s right to determine his future hangs in the balance and this case will set a precedent for others.
Help us #SaveJames – and save thousands of children.
It is confirmed that the mother has hired Jessica Hall Janicek at KOONSFULLER, P.C. as her new legal representation. This is a well known and respected firm with a reputation of aggressive representation. Designation-of-Lead-Counsel-for-Petitioner
The next hearing will be on February 28th over her motion to close and seal court documents.
The custody evaluation is still a work in progress and this will determine the placement of the children between now and when this ultimately goes to trial.
We are continually having to refute allegations that this is unreal or a scam of some sort. It seems that there are those who think that the numerous court documents we have on the site are somehow fabricated because they can’t be found online. In family court – the privacy of children is taken into account and therefore custody cases like this are only accessible online to an active member of the bar. If you aren’t a legal representative, the only way you can access these documents is to go to the actual courthouse in person and request them (which we did) and pay a copying fee. On the last page of the original court filing you will see a receipt where my husband paid for the copies with his name as the payor. If you are at all concerned about the truth of this, I urge you to go to the courthouse yourself and request this information. For those who are supporting this cause, I ask that you help us to protect these kids by refuting false allegations and asking any who call it a scam to provide proof to the contrary. Claiming that something is invalid or a scam with no proof is more damaging than people realize. I understand that this is frightening and seems like it shouldn’t be possible. I wish it weren’t true! Unfortunately, it is and the very real life of this child and his brother are at stake. Please continue to share and help us to protect these kids.
Below you will find a letter from Texas State Representative Matt Rinaldi as further proof.